How many years is 3 score and 10

how many years is 3 score and 10

The Score - "Unstoppable” (Official Audio) Download Here: Listen on Spotify: .

Make Hexa Puzzle is a new family game for iOS and Android ♥ If you enjoyed my video please Comment, Like, Favorite, Subscribe.

ALBUM: Five Score and Seven Years Ago BAND: Relient K (one of my Favorites) This is one of my favorite Bands and my favorite Album of Relient K :) And I . - - Lincoln's Gettysburg Address is one of the great moments of American history. There's a myth that he wrote it on .

I've reached level 4000 and will do another video when I get to 5000.

Acclaimed composer Carter Burwell joins Variety's Steve Chagollan to reveal what went into the score for “Carol,” which garnered Burwell his first Oscar .

Watch this video in context on the official Unity learn pages - In this .

This is the melody of Watermelon Man, written by Herbie Hancock. Choose 480 or 720p for better resolution. Here you can play along with my backing track: .

Antonio Banderas presenting James Horner with the Original Dramatic Score Oscar® for "Titanic" and Madonna presenting James Horner and Will Jennings the .

Bass lesson website and explain

This took weeks for me to complete and end this game and score the highest possible tile with no possible moves left. FYI, this could be possible because of .

Kneading Conference West -2011 - Professional Baking Class - Scoring Baguettes - Instructors Michael Eggebrecht and Jesse Dodson You can find more .

Watch this video in context on Unity's learning pages here - The UI: Displaying text and ending .

And it's three score and ten Boys and men were lost from Grimsby town From Yarmouth down to Scarborough Many hundreds more were drowned Our herring .

Kobe explains how he decided to walk away from basketball and what it took to persuade veteran animator Glen Keane and legendary composer John Williams .

Orquestration. For full score and parts of this piece of Ennio Morricone. contact [email protected] Created with Sibelius 7, EWQL Gold Edition .

The Ballina Whalers at the Rosses Point Shanty festival 2014.

Nokia 8 AnTuTu benchmarking test, score and comparison with high-end flagship smartphones. Nokia 8 - Unboxing and First Impressions .

Monster HIgh Iris Clops Score and So Many Shopkins Shopping Carts! We finally got out to go Doll Hunting and we found I Heart Fashion Iris Clops! Mommy .


This is the original backing track I created many years ago for my performance of this guitar solo. The score and TAB are entirely my interpretation of what Jimmy .

Thanks Emily for sending me this tool to review, it was sure fun to try out. Measurements for the rosette angel. Dress 5 x 4 1/4 inches Halo 5 x 1 1/4 inches Wings .

Finding the z-score that corresponds to a given Percentile (area shaded to the left of the z-score).

Kneading Conference West -2011 - Professional Baking Class - Final Shaping, Scoring and Baking of Boules - Instructors Michael Eggebrecht and Jesse .

NBA's Top 10 All-Time Playoffs Scoring Leaders: How Many Can You Name?

How many years is 3 score and 10

LeBron James is trying to make his mark in NBA Finals history by winning his first championship.

But, as of now, LBJ (2,515 points) hasn't cracked the Top 10 list when it comes to the top scorers in the league's postseason records.

In fact, it will be at least another year before he probably breaks into the Top 25 (No. 25: Patrick Ewing, 2,813).

The following is a list of the NBA's Top 10 All-Time Playoff scorers.

Before you look at the list, see how many you can name.

How many years is 3 score and 10

Hakeem Olajuwon scored 3,755 post-season points in his Hall of Fame career.

He won two NBA Championships (1994–1995) and two NBA Finals MVP awards (1994–1995) with the Houston Rockets.

How many years is 3 score and 10

John Havlicek scored 3,776 postseason points in his Hall of Fame career.

He won eight NBA Championships (1963–1966, 1968–1969, 1974, 1976) and one NBA Finals MVP award (1974) with the Boston Celtics.

How many years is 3 score and 10

Larry Bird scored 3,897 postseason points in his Hall of Fame career.

He won three NBA Championships (1981, 1984, 1986) and three NBA Finals MVP awards (1984,1986) with the Boston Celtics.

How many years is 3 score and 10

Tim Duncan scored 3,990 postseason points so far in his 14-year career.

He won four NBA Championships (1999, 2003, 2005, 2007) and three NBA Finals MVP awards (1999, 2003, 2005) with the San Antonio Spurs.

How many years is 3 score and 10

Jerry West scored 4,457 postseason points in his Hall of Fame career.

He won an NBA Championship and an NBA Finals MVP award with the Los Angeles Lakers.

How many years is 3 score and 10

Karl Malone scored 4,761 postseason points in his Hall of Fame career with the Utah Jazz and Los Angeles Lakers.

He is the only player on this Top 10 Playoffs Scorers list that didn't win an NBA Championship or an NBA Finals MVP award.

How many years is 3 score and 10

He won four NBA Championships (2000-02 with the Lakers, and 2006 with the Miami Heat) and three NBA Finals MVP awards (2000–2002) with the Los Angeles Lakers.

How many years is 3 score and 10

Kobe Bryant scored 5,280 postseason points so far in his 15-year career.

He won five NBA Championships (2000, 2001, 2002, 2009, 2010) and two NBA Finals MVP awards (2009–2010) with the Los Angeles Lakers.

How many years is 3 score and 10

Kareem Abdul-Jabbar scored 5,762 postseason points in his 20-year career.

He won six NBA Championships (Milwaukee Bucks: 1&71; Los Angles Lakers: 1980, 1982, 1985, 1987–1988) and two NBA Finals MVP awards (1971, 1985)

How many years is 3 score and 10

Michael Jordan is the NBA All-Time Postseason scoring champion.

He scored 5,987 postseason points in his Hall of Fame career with the Chicago Bulls.

He won six NBA Championships (1991–1993, 1996–1998) and each time was named the NBA Finals MVP

American Schools vs. the World: Expensive, Unequal, Bad at Math

What the latest results of an international test tell us about the state of education in the United States

The False Equation of Atheism and Intellectual Sophistication

Joerg Sarbach/AP Photo

The U.S. education system is mediocre compared to the rest of the world, according to an international ranking of OECD countries.

More than half a million 15-year-olds around the world took the Programme for International Student Assessment in 2012. The test, which is administered every three years and focuses largely on math, but includes minor sections in science and reading, is often used as a snapshot of the global state of education. The results, published today, show the U.S. trailing behind educational powerhouses like Korea and Finland.

Not much has changed since 2000, when the U.S. scored along the OECD average in every subject: This year, the U.S. scores below average in math and ranks 17th among the 34 OECD countries. It scores close to the OECD average in science and reading and ranks 21st in science and 17th in reading.

Here are some other takeaways from the report:

The U.S. scored below the PISA math mean and ranks 26th out of the 34 OECD countries. The U.S. math score is not statistically different than the following countries: Norway, Portugal, Italy, Spain, Russian Federation, Slovak Republic, Lithuania, Sweden, and Hungary.

On average, 13 percent of students scored at the highest or second highest level on the PISA test, making them “top performers.” Fifty-five percent of students in Shanghai-China were considered top performers, while only nine percent of American students were.

One in four U.S. students did not reach the PISA baseline level 2 of mathematics proficiency. At this level, “students begin to demonstrate the skills that will enable them to participate effectively and productively in life,” according to the PISA report.

Even the top students in the United States are behind: This year, the PISA report offered regional scores for Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Florida. Massachusetts, which is a high-achieving U.S. state and which averaged above the national PISA score, is still two years of formal schooling behind Shanghai.

The U.S. ranks fifth in spending per student. Only Austria, Luxembourg, Norway, and Switzerland spend more per student. To put this in context: the Slovak Republic, which scores similarly to the U.S., spends $53,000 per student. The U.S. spends $115,000. The PISA report notes that, among OECD countries, “higher expenditure on education is not highly predictive of better mathematics scores in PISA.”

Socio-Economic Class Plays a Larger Role in the U.S. Than in Other Countries

Fifteen percent of the American score variation is explained by socio-economic differences between students. Less than 10 percent of score variation in Finland, Hong Kong, Japan, and Norway is due to socio-economic differences.

The U.S. also has a lower than average number of “resilient students,” which PISA defines as “students who are among the 25 percent most socio-economically disadvantaged students but perform much better than would be predicted by their socio-economic class.” On average, seven percent of students are considered resilient. Thirteen percent of of students in Korea, Hong Kong, Macao-China, Shanghai-China, Singapore, and Vietnam are “resilient.”

Parts of China, Singapore, Japan, Korea, and Liechtenstein topped the rankings for math, reading, and science. Finland, which is often pointed to as an example of an excellent school system, continued to perform well. However, the country dropped 2.8 points in math, 1.7 points in reading, and three points in science in “annualized changes in score points,” which are the “average annual change in PISA score points since the country’s earliest participation in PISA.”

The biggest annualized score improvements came from Brazil, Tunisia, Mexico, Turkey, and Portugal. Italy, Poland, and Germany also showed gains since 2003.

Click for larger image of chart

How seriously should we take these dismal findings? Educators around the world have called for tempered reactions to the PISA scores and questioned the usefulness of the tests. Nevertheless, this year’s report—and the United States’ poor math results—may be worth paying attention to for at least one reason. A 2011 study found that PISA scores are an economic indicator: rising scores are a good sign that a country’s economy will grow as well.

The Lawyer and Gold Star father believes that Americans should look to its oldest documents for guidance.

  • How many years is 3 score and 10 Hannibal Hanschke / Reutuers

Why the science of healthy eating appears confusing—but isn’t

If you’ve ever been on the internet, you’ve noticed that some things are popular, and other things aren’t. The popular ones have something in common. It’s not quality, or importance, or accuracy, but novelty.

An example of this is Moby-Dick. It’s a timeless novel by an acclaimed writer, and most people haven’t read it. The complete text is free on the internet. You could be reading it right now. But are you? And how many of your Facebook friends shared Moby-Dick today? Probably not more than one or two.

Obsession with novelty has been called “neophilia.” The term was used as early as 1965 in a story by J.D. Salinger, who was apparently wary of it. But being attracted to novelty doesn’t necessarily mean readers are dumb or attention-deficient. To some degree, novelty-seeking is evolutionarily adaptive and associated with good health.

More comfortable online than out partying, post-Millennials are safer, physically, than adolescents have ever been. But they’re on the brink of a mental-health crisis.

O ne day last summer, around noon, I called Athena, a 13-year-old who lives in Houston, Texas. She answered her phone—she’s had an iPhone since she was 11—sounding as if she’d just woken up. We chatted about her favorite songs and TV shows, and I asked her what she likes to do with her friends. “We go to the mall,” she said. “Do your parents drop you off?,” I asked, recalling my own middle-school days, in the 1980s, when I’d enjoy a few parent-free hours shopping with my friends. “No—I go with my family,” she replied. “We’ll go with my mom and brothers and walk a little behind them. I just have to tell my mom where we’re going. I have to check in every hour or every 30 minutes.”

Those mall trips are infrequent—about once a month. More often, Athena and her friends spend time together on their phones, unchaperoned. Unlike the teens of my generation, who might have spent an evening tying up the family landline with gossip, they talk on Snapchat, the smartphone app that allows users to send pictures and videos that quickly disappear. They make sure to keep up their Snapstreaks, which show how many days in a row they have Snapchatted with each other. Sometimes they save screenshots of particularly ridiculous pictures of friends. “It’s good blackmail,” Athena said. (Because she’s a minor, I’m not using her real name.) She told me she’d spent most of the summer hanging out alone in her room with her phone. That’s just the way her generation is, she said. “We didn’t have a choice to know any life without iPads or iPhones. I think we like our phones more than we like actual people.”

The False Equation of Atheism and Intellectual Sophistication

Beyond the argument that faith in God is irrational—and therefore illegitimate

Atheism is intellectually fashionable. In the past month, The New York Times has run several stories about lack of faith in its series on religion. The New Yorker ran an article on the history of non-belief in reaction to two new books on the subject that were released within a week of each other in February. The veteran writer, Adam Gopnik, concludes this:

What the noes, whatever their numbers, really have now … is a monopoly on legitimate forms of knowledge about the natural world. They have this monopoly for the same reason that computer manufacturers have an edge over crystal-ball makers: The advantages of having an actual explanation of things and processes are self-evident.

This is a perfect summary of the intellectual claim of those who set out to prove that God is dead and religion is false: Atheists have legitimate knowledge, and those who believe do not. This is the epistemological assumption looming in the so-called “culture war” between the caricatures of godless liberals and Bible-thumping conservatives in America: One group wields rational argumentation and intellectual history as an indictment of God, while the other looks to tradition and text as defenses against modernity’s encroachment on religious life.

In the fall of 1958 Theodore Kaczynski, a brilliant but vulnerable boy of sixteen, entered Harvard College. There he encountered a prevailing intellectual atmosphere of anti-technological despair. There, also, he was deceived into subjecting himself to a series of purposely brutalizing psychological experiments—experiments that may have confirmed his still-forming belief in the evil of science. Was the Unabomber born at Harvard? A look inside the files

Like many Harvard alumni, I sometimes wander the neighborhood when I return to Cambridge, reminiscing about the old days and musing on how different my life has been from what I hoped and expected then. On a trip there last fall I found myself a few blocks north of Harvard Yard, on Divinity Avenue. Near the end of this dead-end street sits the Peabody Museum—a giant Victorian structure attached to the Botanical Museum, where my mother had taken me as a young boy, in 1943, to view the spectacular exhibit of glass flowers. These left such a vivid impression that a decade later my recollection of them inspired me, then a senior in high school, to apply to Harvard.

This time my return was prompted not by nostalgia but by curiosity. No. 7 Divinity Avenue is a modern multi-story academic building today, housing the university’s Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology. In 1959 a comfortable old house stood on the site. Known as the Annex, it served as a laboratory in which staff members of the Department of Social Relations conducted research on human subjects. There, from the fall of 1959 through the spring of 1962, Harvard psychologists, led by Henry A. Murray, conducted a disturbing and what would now be seen as ethically indefensible experiment on twenty-two undergraduates. To preserve the anonymity of these student guinea pigs, experimenters referred to individuals by code name only. One of these students, whom they dubbed “Lawful,” was Theodore John Kaczynski, who would one day be known as the Unabomber, and who would later mail or deliver sixteen package bombs to scientists, academicians, and others over seventeen years, killing three people and injuring twenty-three.

The divide sometimes has devastating consequences.

Doctors are doctors, and dentists are dentists, and never the twain shall meet. Whether you have health insurance is one thing, whether you have dental insurance is another. Your doctor doesn’t ask you if you’re flossing, and your dentist doesn’t ask you if you’re exercising. In America, we treat the mouth separately from the rest of the body, a bizarre situation that Mary Otto explores in her new book, Teeth: The Story of Beauty, Inequality, and the Struggle for Oral Health in America.

Specializing in one part of the body isn’t what’s weird—it would be one thing if dentists were like dermatologists or cardiologists. The weird thing is that oral care is divorced from medicine’s education system, physician networks, medical records, and payment systems, so that a dentist is not just a special kind of doctor, but another profession entirely.

With the GOP currently running everything, coming up with a suitably electrifying bogeyman could prove challenging.

Like most politics of late, the 2018 elections promise to be wild and weird. For starters, midterms typically serve as a referendum on the sitting president—which should be fabulous news for Democrats, given that Donald Trump’s favorability numbers are now smaller than his waistline. Except! When one peruses the actual electoral map, the House, Senate, and gubernatorial landscapes all favor Republicans.

As for turnout, while the GOP’s base (read: old, white folk) is usually far better about voting in non-presidential years than the Democrats’ (read: young ‘uns and minorities), Dems are unusually exercised (read: apoplectic) about this president. And while hardcore Trumpkins are expected to stand by their man, a growing number of “soft” Trump voters are expressing buyer’s remorse. There’s no telling how this cohort will vote (or not) come next November.

The nation’s current post-truth moment is the ultimate expression of mind-sets that have made America exceptional throughout its history.

When did America become untethered from reality?

I first noticed our national lurch toward fantasy in 2004, after President George W. Bush’s political mastermind, Karl Rove, came up with the remarkable phrase reality-based community. People in “the reality-based community,” he told a reporter, “believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality … That’s not the way the world really works anymore.” A year later, The Colbert Report went on the air. In the first few minutes of the first episode, Stephen Colbert, playing his right-wing-populist commentator character, performed a feature called “The Word.” His first selection: truthiness. “Now, I’m sure some of the ‘word police,’ the ‘wordinistas’ over at Webster’s, are gonna say, ‘Hey, that’s not a word!’ Well, anybody who knows me knows that I’m no fan of dictionaries or reference books.

Why a Republican Pollster Is Losing Faith in Her Party

“If I pack up my toys and go home, there are people in red MAGA hats who would be saying, ‘Don’t let the door hit you on your way out.’”

Kristen Soltis Anderson is losing faith in her party. And that should trigger alarms for Republican leaders concerned about the GOP’s long-term health.

Anderson is a smart and telegenic young Republican pollster. She has specialized in studying how the party can improve its anemic performance among the Millennial generation, which will pass the right-leaning baby boomers to become the largest generation of eligible voters in 2018.

Now she is wondering whether Donald Trump’s GOP has a place for people like her, who want a party that marries support for less government and robust national defense with a commitment to racial and social inclusion.

“There are still enough good people inside … that I agree with that I am still staying,” Anderson told me recently. “But I am significantly less convinced that I am going to succeed in this effort. [That’s] because at the same moment somebody like me is becoming very disheartened, there are voters who are thinking, ‘This is the Republican Party I have been waiting for.’ If I pack up my toys and go home, there are people in red MAGA hats who would be saying, ‘Don’t let the door hit you on your way out.’”

Forecasters are monitoring the storm as it makes its way across the Atlantic, but it's too early to tell where it might strike.

As Harvey moves on from southeastern Texas and floodwaters start to recede, meteorologists are tracking another storm brewing in the eastern Atlantic Ocean that they say could potentially approach the United States in the coming weeks.

Irma became a Category 3 hurricane late Thursday afternoon, making it the season’s second major hurricane. The hurricane now packs maximum sustained winds of 115 miles per hour, with stronger gusts.

Irma had already quickly transformed from a tropical storm Wednesday morning into a Category 2 hurricane Thursday afternoon, according to the National Hurricane Center. It exhibits an unusual—but not unprecedented—rate of growth, according to meteorologists.

Like Harvey and other Atlantic hurricanes, Irma started as a tropical wave off the coast of Africa and began a slow, westward churn across the Atlantic. Irma will spend the next few days traveling toward the eastern Caribbean region. Beyond that, it’s still too early to predict exactly where the hurricane will go, meteorologists say.

The Trump administration is poised to slash rates for rich Americans. What about going in the exact opposite direction?

President Donald Trump on Wednesday pitched a dramatic tax overhaul that would be "the biggest ever" tax cut for middle-class Americans. The pitch included few specifics, but if it resembles past blueprints, there is little doubt that it will indeed be a historically massive tax break—just for rich Americans like Donald Trump.

There are better ideas. One comes, surprisingly, from the chief adviser whom Trump just fired.

In July, several news outlets reported that Steve Bannon was pushing for a new tax rate for the richest Americans. Strangely, this puts the alt-right ringleader on the same team as Massachusetts liberals, who recently voted 134-55 to put a millionaire tax—a new tax on all income earned over $1 million—on the 2018 ballot.

  • How many years is 3 score and 10

    From a moral standpoint, it makes the world worse.

  • How many years is 3 score and 10

    Genetic Testing Is Recreating Bonds Broken by Slavery

    Alondra Nelson discusses how ancestry tests can empower African Americans.

  • How many years is 3 score and 10

    It doesn't have to be awkward. James Hamblin and Dr. Lauren Streicher, author of Love Sex Again, discuss how to bring up sexual issues with your doctor, partner, and friends.

  • Like this post? Please share to your friends: